To Solve a Tough Problem, Reframe It

Author: Harvard Business Review article Type: Management / problem-solving article


Core Premise

Teams often rush into solution mode before they have defined the problem well enough. The article argues that complex problems should first go through problem-framing: deliberately exploring multiple ways to define the issue before selecting interventions.


The E5 Problem-Framing Process

The article's framework is E5:

  1. Expand — generate alternative frames instead of assuming the first diagnosis is right
  2. Examine — dig below surface events into patterns, structures, and mental models
  3. Empathize — understand how key stakeholders experience the problem
  4. Elevate — zoom out to broader organizational frames and system interactions
  5. Envision — define the desired future state, then work backward into action

The core move is simple: before brainstorming answers, do frame-storming on the question itself.


Useful Tools Inside the Process

The article bundles several reusable tools:

  • frame-storming — generate multiple candidate definitions of the problem
  • iceberg model — move from visible events down into patterns, structures, and mental models
  • empathy maps — capture what stakeholders say, think, feel, and do
  • four-frame model — inspect structural, human, political, and symbolic dimensions
  • backcasting — define a future target, then reverse-engineer the path back to the present

Together these tools try to prevent one of the most common managerial failures: solving the wrong problem efficiently.


Why It Matters

The article is valuable because it treats framing as a competitive advantage rather than a soft prelude to execution. It overlaps with several existing themes in the wiki:

Its distinctive contribution is operational: it gives a repeatable team process for slowing down long enough to see the actual problem.

Related Concepts