About-You Introduction

Rebecca Okamoto's distinction between introductions that describe you and introductions that describe what you can do for them.

Most people answer "Tell me about yourself" with credentials, titles, and accomplishment lists — an about-me introduction. The listener's question is rarely autobiographical. They want to know whether you can solve their problem.

The Contrast

About-me: "I'm an award-winning, best-selling author."

About-you: "I help new authors get published faster."

One describes identity and status. The other describes a benefit to the listener. The difference is audible immediately.

Why About-Me Fails

Okamoto learned this by rejection. She entered a supply-chain instructor interview with 20 years of P&G expertise and a pitch listing every accomplishment. The interviewer wanted to hear what she could do for the institute, not what she had done for herself. Smart, qualified, perfect fit — none of it mattered without capturing attention in the listener's frame.

The fix isn't hiding qualifications. It's leading with the listener's stake before (or instead of) your biography.

Relation to Carnegie

This rhymes with talking in terms of the other person's interests — enter their world first. Okamoto makes it operational for the opening sentence: the first 20 words should be about their benefit, not your pedigree.

A strong about-you intro also triggers let them talk — the goal is "Tell me more," not a monologue.

The Imposter Reframe

When rejections pile up, the inner critic often blames competence. Okamoto argues the failure mode may be structural: an about-me introduction makes qualified people sound self-focused. Before accepting the imposter narrative, test whether the introduction is oriented toward the listener.

Connections

Sources